sec·ond-ˈguess ГЛ. перех. esp америк.
1. second-guess (forecast):
2. second-guess (criticize with hindsight):
| I | second-guess |
|---|---|
| you | second-guess |
| he/she/it | second-guesses |
| we | second-guess |
| you | second-guess |
| they | second-guess |
| I | second-guessed |
|---|---|
| you | second-guessed |
| he/she/it | second-guessed |
| we | second-guessed |
| you | second-guessed |
| they | second-guessed |
| I | have | second-guessed |
|---|---|---|
| you | have | second-guessed |
| he/she/it | has | second-guessed |
| we | have | second-guessed |
| you | have | second-guessed |
| they | have | second-guessed |
| I | had | second-guessed |
|---|---|---|
| you | had | second-guessed |
| he/she/it | had | second-guessed |
| we | had | second-guessed |
| you | had | second-guessed |
| they | had | second-guessed |
PONS OpenDictДобавить статью
Вы хотите добавить слова, фразы или переводы?
Пожалуйста, отправьте нам новый словарный запись для PONS OpenDict. Внесенные предложения проверяются редакцией PONS и соответствующим образом включаются в результаты.
No example sentences available
Try a different entry
Одноязычные примеры (не проверены редакцией PONS)
If they report the hammer being used, a witness might begin to second-guess their memory wondering if they missed the hammer or failed to remember that detail.
en.wikipedia.org Because we were so new, it was really hard not to second-guess what we believe in, which was that we shouldn't be incorporating fees.
www.theglobeandmail.com I'm going to have to go with my first idea, not second-guess everything all the time, be so fussy.
www.theglobeandmail.com Interested viewers had to search and second-guess, playing parlor games to suss out a character's sexuality.
en.wikipedia.org In the face of this resistance, it may be tempting to get discouraged, to second-guess the effort, to soft-pedal our message.
en.wikipedia.org Примеры из интернета (не проверены редакцией PONS)
[...]
goldnews-de.bullionvault.com Other commentators, however, ask whether a " leak " was needed for some trading houses to try and second-guess the volatility which the Fed s announcement was likely to create, whether it chose to taper its $ 85 billion in monthly QE money creation or not.
[...]
Andere Kommentatoren stellen sich allerdings die Frage, warum einige Handelshäuser diese „ undichte Stelle “ benötigten, um die Volatilität vorauszusagen, welche solch eine Ankündigung der Fed erwartungsgemäß erzeugen würde, unabhängig davon, ob diese ihr Stimulusprogramm QE3 in Höhe von monatlich 85 Mrd. US-Dollar reduzieren würde oder nicht.